The Politics Behind Iraq’s Jaafari Law

Beyond child marriage and custody, the Jaafari Law codifies longstanding practices that restrict women’s rights and protect tribal wealth.

The Iraqi Parliament recently passed the Jaafari Law, a piece of legislation rooted in Shi’a Islamic jurisprudence. At its core, the law governs family and personal status issues, including marriage, divorce, custody, and inheritance. Supporters argue it aligns Iraq’s legal system with common religious practice, giving Shi’a families the ability to settle matters in ways consistent with their faith. Critics, however, warn that the law undermines women’s rights by lowering the minimum age of marriage, restricting inheritance, and limiting women’s custody of their children.

Among its most contentious provisions are rules that strip mothers of custody if they remarry, remove the requirement that a first wife consent to her husband’s polygamy, and deny women custody or financial support if they leave the marital home. Human rights groups argue that these measures entrench women’s dependency and erode protections established under Iraq’s secular Personal Status Law.

To understand the significance of the Jaafari Law, it helps to step back. Iraq’s population is majority Shi’a Muslim, and religion plays a central role in everyday life, particularly in family matters. For many Shi’a families, a marriage is not considered valid unless it is overseen by a cleric. This blending of law and faith means that legislation like the Jaafari Law is never just about politics—it is also about religious authority, social norms, and economic interests.

This is not the first time Shi’a religious leaders and political parties have sought to bring family law under clerical control. In 2013, Justice Minister Hassan al-Shammari introduced an earlier version of the Jaafari Personal Status Law on behalf of the Fadhila Party, a small Shi’a Islamist group tied to Islamic cleric Muhammad al-Yaqoubi. That proposal quickly drew fierce opposition from women’s organizations and international rights groups, who warned it would roll back protections for women and children. Under mounting public pressure, the bill stalled.

The most recent push succeeded because of shifting political dynamics. The bill was reintroduced by independent Member of Parliament (MP) Raed al-Maliki, sidestepping rivalries among Shi’a clerical factions that had blocked earlier efforts. At the same time, Iraq’s civil society—once vocal in resisting such laws—has weakened since the mid-2010s and mounted less opposition. Sunni and Kurdish MPs, meanwhile, were advancing their own community-specific legislation, and a package deal created the parliamentary momentum needed for the Jaafari Law to pass.

Supporters of the law frame it in explicitly religious terms. For Shi’a Muslims, as for many Muslims and adherents of other faiths, issues like marriage and custody are inseparable from worship. A marriage contract not performed under a jurist’s supervision is considered invalid, rendering the union sinful and the children illegitimate.

Even under Iraq’s secular legal system, most Shi’a families already conduct a religious marriage contract alongside the state-issued one. Clerics are often present at engagement ceremonies to finalize this contract, which allows couples to interact more freely until the court paperwork is completed. Without it, even ordinary contact would be seen as forbidden.

This reliance on clerical authority is a key reason why Shi’a MPs have consistently pushed for laws that place personal status matters under their jurisprudence. For them, secular law leaves these aspects of family life incomplete without religious validation.

Religion, however, tells only part of the story. The economic dimension is just as critical. By restricting women’s inheritance rights—particularly their ability to inherit land—the Jaafari Law ensures that wealth remains within the husband’s family and tribe. In practice, it prevents property from passing into another lineage through marriage.

Iraq’s secular Personal Status Law, by contrast, allows property to be transferred across families and tribes, gradually redistributing wealth. The Jaafari framework therefore preserves tribal wealth and reinforces class continuity, while the secular framework threatens to dilute concentrations of property. This is not a new practice: in many parts of Iraq, women are informally denied their inheritance despite legal entitlement, especially when it comes to farmland or high-value real estate. The new law effectively codifies this extrajudicial cultural custom.

Much international attention has focused on the Jaafari Law’s social consequences: child marriage, custody, divorce, and alimony provisions. These are indeed deeply consequential. Yet to reduce the debate to its social dimension alone risks missing the bigger picture. The law is as much about protecting property and reinforcing entrenched social hierarchies as it is about codifying religious doctrine.

In early 2025, Iraq’s parliament amended the 1959 secular Personal Status Law to allow couples to choose between the secular system or the Jaafari Code. Once a couple opts into the Jaafari system, the decision cannot be reversed. Human rights organizations, including Human Rights Watch, have sharply criticized the change, warning that it deepens inequality and sets back protections for women and children.

While earlier drafts raised fears that child marriage as young as nine might be legalized, the final text kept Iraq’s existing age limits: 18, or 15 with judicial approval. Even so, critics argue that the law strengthens clerical courts and erodes the principle of equal citizenship before the law.

In August 2025, Iraq’s Federal Supreme Court upheld the law against constitutional challenges, confirming its compatibility with the constitution and clearing the way for full implementation. Already, courts in provinces such as Basra have begun processing cases under the Jaafari Code, from marriage contracts to divorces.

The Jaafari Law is best understood as the outcome of intersecting religious and economic interests. Its passage reflects both a persistent effort to bring personal status law under clerical authority and a drive to consolidate wealth within tribal and sectarian structures.

Opposition has weakened, political maneuvering has shifted, and judicial challenges have failed. For Iraq’s legislators, the law is not just about religion or electoral politics. It is about power—social, political, and economic—and the structures they are determined to preserve.

Ultimately, the Jaafari Law represents a step backward for Iraq’s tenuous democracy. By subordinating women’s rights to clerical authority and reinforcing the concentration of wealth within tribal networks, the law narrows rather than expands the possibilities of justice. Its passage not only codifies inequality but also signals the state’s retreat from guaranteeing equal citizenship to all Iraqis. In privileging sectarian jurisprudence over universal protections, parliament has chosen to entrench power rather than to reform it—at the expense of women, minorities, and the broader project of building a pluralistic society.

Middle East Uncovered is powered by Ideas Beyond Borders. The views expressed in Middle East Uncovered are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Ideas Beyond Borders.